<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 9 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2800</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal as the revenue failed to prove timely service of the initial notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act within the statutory period. The tribunal emphasized the importance of providing evidence for timely notice service. The court imposed costs on the revenue, directing payment for juvenile justice, to deter frivolous appeals and prioritize serious matters, promoting a responsible legal system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 9 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2800</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal as the revenue failed to prove timely service of the initial notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act within the statutory period. The tribunal emphasized the importance of providing evidence for timely notice service. The court imposed costs on the revenue, directing payment for juvenile justice, to deter frivolous appeals and prioritize serious matters, promoting a responsible legal system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>