https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180512 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of most additions made by the AO, finding insufficient evidence to support them. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of a portion of conveyance and general expenses, and retained 25% of the addition for lower household expenses. The AO's additions on unaccounted investments, agricultural income, household, marriage, gross profit, evaporation, bank deposits, unexplained cash credits, capital gains, commission expenses, salary expenses, and unaccounted sales were deleted by the Tribunal due to lack of evidence or adequate support. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:37:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180512 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of most additions made by the AO, finding insufficient evidence to support them. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of a portion of conveyance and general expenses, and retained 25% of the addition for lower household expenses. The AO's additions on unaccounted investments, agricultural income, household, marriage, gross profit, evaporation, bank deposits, unexplained cash credits, capital gains, commission expenses, salary expenses, and unaccounted sales were deleted by the Tribunal due to lack of evidence or adequate support. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180512