<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 845 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180511</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, providing relief on the inclusion of CENVAT credit in the closing stock and partial relief on the classification of interest receipts. It upheld the use of Cost Plus Method (CPM) for determining the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) but directed the AO to allow volume discount adjustments. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 845 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180511</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, providing relief on the inclusion of CENVAT credit in the closing stock and partial relief on the classification of interest receipts. It upheld the use of Cost Plus Method (CPM) for determining the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) but directed the AO to allow volume discount adjustments. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>