<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 907 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325723</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the obligation of companies under MAT provisions to pay advance tax following the judgment in Rolta India. The decision clarified the calculation of interest for default in advance tax payment, stressing the significance of legal clarity in tax matters and the influence of judicial interpretations on tax obligations for companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:01:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 907 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325723</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the obligation of companies under MAT provisions to pay advance tax following the judgment in Rolta India. The decision clarified the calculation of interest for default in advance tax payment, stressing the significance of legal clarity in tax matters and the influence of judicial interpretations on tax obligations for companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>