<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 904 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325720</link>
    <description>Amounts paid for expatriate employees seconded to India were treated by the adjudicating authority as consideration for manpower recruitment or supply agency services under reverse charge. The Tribunal, following an earlier Tribunal ruling affirmed by the High Court, noted that salary-linked secondment payments do not constitute manpower recruitment or supply agency services. It therefore held that the assessee had made out a strong prima facie case against service tax on this head, and the demand was not sustainable at this stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 904 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325720</link>
      <description>Amounts paid for expatriate employees seconded to India were treated by the adjudicating authority as consideration for manpower recruitment or supply agency services under reverse charge. The Tribunal, following an earlier Tribunal ruling affirmed by the High Court, noted that salary-linked secondment payments do not constitute manpower recruitment or supply agency services. It therefore held that the assessee had made out a strong prima facie case against service tax on this head, and the demand was not sustainable at this stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>