<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 901 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325717</link>
    <description>The appellant sought a refund of accumulated CENVAT credit prior to registration. The Commissioner allowed the appeal, relying on a High Court decision stating registration is not mandatory for claiming credit. As the rules did not mandate registration for credit, the accumulated credit was deemed refundable. The decision favored the respondent, allowing the refund based on the absence of a statutory requirement for registration to claim credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 901 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325717</link>
      <description>The appellant sought a refund of accumulated CENVAT credit prior to registration. The Commissioner allowed the appeal, relying on a High Court decision stating registration is not mandatory for claiming credit. As the rules did not mandate registration for credit, the accumulated credit was deemed refundable. The decision favored the respondent, allowing the refund based on the absence of a statutory requirement for registration to claim credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>