<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 898 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand by clubbing the clearance value of multiple units, citing lack of manufacturing activity in certain units and interdependence based on financial transactions. Penalties were imposed on involved entities, with penalties on dummy units set aside due to lack of justification. The Tribunal recognized direct involvement of individuals in duty evasion, adjusting penalties accordingly to balance individual responsibility and reducing penalties on those directly involved. Concerns over excessive penalty quantum were addressed by the Tribunal, leading to adjustments based on the level of involvement in the evasion scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 898 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand by clubbing the clearance value of multiple units, citing lack of manufacturing activity in certain units and interdependence based on financial transactions. Penalties were imposed on involved entities, with penalties on dummy units set aside due to lack of justification. The Tribunal recognized direct involvement of individuals in duty evasion, adjusting penalties accordingly to balance individual responsibility and reducing penalties on those directly involved. Concerns over excessive penalty quantum were addressed by the Tribunal, leading to adjustments based on the level of involvement in the evasion scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>