<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 100 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding the refund of service tax paid under protest for consultancy services falling under Consulting Engineers Services. The Tribunal upheld that service tax on scientific and technical services was applicable from a specific date, making the tax paid prior to that period refundable. The appeal lacked merit, leading to its rejection by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 100 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding the refund of service tax paid under protest for consultancy services falling under Consulting Engineers Services. The Tribunal upheld that service tax on scientific and technical services was applicable from a specific date, making the tax paid prior to that period refundable. The appeal lacked merit, leading to its rejection by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>