<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 452 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180482</link>
    <description>The Court affirmed the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. It directed the Income Tax Officer to recompute deductions under section 80M based on gross dividends without deducting proportionate expenditure, as the shares held were considered as stock-in-trade, eliminating the need for apportionment between dividend and business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 452 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180482</link>
      <description>The Court affirmed the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. It directed the Income Tax Officer to recompute deductions under section 80M based on gross dividends without deducting proportionate expenditure, as the shares held were considered as stock-in-trade, eliminating the need for apportionment between dividend and business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>