<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1410 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside lower authorities&#039; orders on Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions involving trading imported goods, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration using the Resale Price Method (RPM). The Tribunal dismissed the issue of excluding comparables as infructuous. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:50:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1410 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside lower authorities&#039; orders on Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions involving trading imported goods, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration using the Resale Price Method (RPM). The Tribunal dismissed the issue of excluding comparables as infructuous. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>