https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325668 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties under Sections 76, 77(1a), and 77(2) of the Finance Act 1994. The judgment emphasized the absence of any intent to evade payment of service tax and the appellant's prompt action upon clarification, highlighting the reasonable cause for the initial non-payment. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325668 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties under Sections 76, 77(1a), and 77(2) of the Finance Act 1994. The judgment emphasized the absence of any intent to evade payment of service tax and the appellant's prompt action upon clarification, highlighting the reasonable cause for the initial non-payment. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325668