<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Firm Denied Cum-Duty Benefit for Clearing Goods Without Proper Invoices; Price Excluded Central Excise Duty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28114</link>
    <description>Evasion of duty -, the goods were cleared without issuing proper invoices and therefore it cannot be said that the price charged included central excise duty. In their statements, partners of the firm also did not claim that price charged was inclusive of duty - cum-duty benefit denied - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:38:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Firm Denied Cum-Duty Benefit for Clearing Goods Without Proper Invoices; Price Excluded Central Excise Duty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28114</link>
      <description>Evasion of duty -, the goods were cleared without issuing proper invoices and therefore it cannot be said that the price charged included central excise duty. In their statements, partners of the firm also did not claim that price charged was inclusive of duty - cum-duty benefit denied - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:38:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>