<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180473</link>
    <description>Outcome: Both the assessee&#039;s and the revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matters to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of verifying facts and applying relevant case laws in the decision-making process. The order was issued on 21 October 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180473</link>
      <description>Outcome: Both the assessee&#039;s and the revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matters to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of verifying facts and applying relevant case laws in the decision-making process. The order was issued on 21 October 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>