<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (1) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180470</link>
    <description>Commission paid to an employee was governed by the specific deduction rule for bonus or commission for services rendered, rather than the residuary expenditure clause, and its allowance depended on reasonableness judged by pay, service conditions, business profits and comparable commercial practice. For excess profits tax, the relevant test permitted only expenditure that was reasonable and necessary for the business, reflecting commercial expediency. In computing net profits for the commission, excess profits tax was not deductible first because it was a charge on profits, not an outgoing incurred to earn them. The commission was therefore allowable, and it had to be worked out on net profits without reducing those profits by excess profits tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:29:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (1) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180470</link>
      <description>Commission paid to an employee was governed by the specific deduction rule for bonus or commission for services rendered, rather than the residuary expenditure clause, and its allowance depended on reasonableness judged by pay, service conditions, business profits and comparable commercial practice. For excess profits tax, the relevant test permitted only expenditure that was reasonable and necessary for the business, reflecting commercial expediency. In computing net profits for the commission, excess profits tax was not deductible first because it was a charge on profits, not an outgoing incurred to earn them. The commission was therefore allowable, and it had to be worked out on net profits without reducing those profits by excess profits tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>