<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1076 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180468</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax wrongly assumed jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had properly verified and accepted the loans and advance based on evidence provided by the assessee. The tribunal set aside the order under Section 263, ruling in favor of the assessee and quashing the revision. Other grounds raised in the appeal were not addressed as a result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1076 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180468</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax wrongly assumed jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had properly verified and accepted the loans and advance based on evidence provided by the assessee. The tribunal set aside the order under Section 263, ruling in favor of the assessee and quashing the revision. Other grounds raised in the appeal were not addressed as a result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>