<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 581 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalties under section 272B of the Income-tax Act for non/quoting of PANs in TDS returns for AY 2006-07. The ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty to &amp;amp;8377; 10,000 per default was affirmed, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument for a penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000 per default. The Tribunal held that Section 272B does not allow for penalties per default, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal on 5.12.2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:15:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 581 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalties under section 272B of the Income-tax Act for non/quoting of PANs in TDS returns for AY 2006-07. The ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty to &amp;amp;8377; 10,000 per default was affirmed, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument for a penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000 per default. The Tribunal held that Section 272B does not allow for penalties per default, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal on 5.12.2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>