<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 26 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2774</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission resolved the case involving misdeclaration of goods and duty evasion by settling the customs duty at Rs. 79,02,897/-, which was already paid. The applicants were required to pay 10% interest within 30 days, and no redemption fine was imposed due to the unavailability of goods for confiscation. Penalties were imposed on specific individuals and entities, with Rs. 1,50,000/- on one main applicant and varying amounts on others, while full immunity from penalties was granted to other co-applicants. Immunity from prosecution was granted under conditions, particularly for one individual, with the order subject to annulment if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 26 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2774</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission resolved the case involving misdeclaration of goods and duty evasion by settling the customs duty at Rs. 79,02,897/-, which was already paid. The applicants were required to pay 10% interest within 30 days, and no redemption fine was imposed due to the unavailability of goods for confiscation. Penalties were imposed on specific individuals and entities, with Rs. 1,50,000/- on one main applicant and varying amounts on others, while full immunity from penalties was granted to other co-applicants. Immunity from prosecution was granted under conditions, particularly for one individual, with the order subject to annulment if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>