<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1228 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s finding was treated as a finding of fact, so no referable question of law arose from its order. On that basis, the High Court found no basis to interfere, and the dismissal remained in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:30:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1228 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s finding was treated as a finding of fact, so no referable question of law arose from its order. On that basis, the High Court found no basis to interfere, and the dismissal remained in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>