<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 844 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180444</link>
    <description>The appeal and cross objection arose from the CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting a non-genuine donation amount. The appellant contended the sum was an accommodation entry. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption under section 11, treating the donation as corpus donation. The High Court decision was binding, and the validity of assessment proceedings under section 147 was not pressed. The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 11(1) except for the application of income shown at Rs. 6,245.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 844 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180444</link>
      <description>The appeal and cross objection arose from the CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting a non-genuine donation amount. The appellant contended the sum was an accommodation entry. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption under section 11, treating the donation as corpus donation. The High Court decision was binding, and the validity of assessment proceedings under section 147 was not pressed. The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 11(1) except for the application of income shown at Rs. 6,245.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>