<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 650 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180438</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals as bill discounting cannot be treated as interest paid, following a previous case involving Cargill Global Trading Pvt. Ltd. Therefore, tax deduction was not required in the case of Cargill Financial Services Asia Pvt Ltd, as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 650 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180438</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals as bill discounting cannot be treated as interest paid, following a previous case involving Cargill Global Trading Pvt. Ltd. Therefore, tax deduction was not required in the case of Cargill Financial Services Asia Pvt Ltd, as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>