https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2769 The Tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty on cotton seed oil import due to FFA content below the specified threshold for concessional duty rates. The appellant's arguments regarding provisional assessment, validity of test reports, sample drawing process, and time limit for duty demand were dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with Notification conditions and procedural correctness in assessment and duty demand, ultimately rejecting the appeal and disposing of the cross-objection accordingly. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2769 The Tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty on cotton seed oil import due to FFA content below the specified threshold for concessional duty rates. The appellant's arguments regarding provisional assessment, validity of test reports, sample drawing process, and time limit for duty demand were dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with Notification conditions and procedural correctness in assessment and duty demand, ultimately rejecting the appeal and disposing of the cross-objection accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2769