<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 811 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325627</link>
    <description>For imported services, service tax under reverse charge is computed on the actual consideration or gross amount charged for the service, not on a recipient-paid tax burden that is outside the service consideration. The record showed tax had already been discharged on the foreign architect&#039;s billed consultancy fee, and there was no basis to treat the income tax borne by the recipient as part of the taxable value. Service tax could not therefore be fastened on that amount, and liability remained confined to the sum actually billed by the foreign architect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 811 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325627</link>
      <description>For imported services, service tax under reverse charge is computed on the actual consideration or gross amount charged for the service, not on a recipient-paid tax burden that is outside the service consideration. The record showed tax had already been discharged on the foreign architect&#039;s billed consultancy fee, and there was no basis to treat the income tax borne by the recipient as part of the taxable value. Service tax could not therefore be fastened on that amount, and liability remained confined to the sum actually billed by the foreign architect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>