<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 174 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants by setting aside the order and revoking penalties. The decision emphasized the absence of suppression or fraudulent intent in the manufacturer&#039;s duty payment discrepancies, supporting the appellant&#039;s credit availing based on supplementary invoices. The Tribunal highlighted the appellant&#039;s transparency in record-keeping and compliance with reporting requirements, leading to a favorable judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 174 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants by setting aside the order and revoking penalties. The decision emphasized the absence of suppression or fraudulent intent in the manufacturer&#039;s duty payment discrepancies, supporting the appellant&#039;s credit availing based on supplementary invoices. The Tribunal highlighted the appellant&#039;s transparency in record-keeping and compliance with reporting requirements, leading to a favorable judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>