https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325625 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the need to apportion credit for services used in 'output service' and 'trading' activities. The decision highlighted the non-retrospective nature of the amendment deeming 'trading' as an 'exempted service,' affirming the validity of the order-in-appeal. The appeal was consequently rejected, and the judgment was pronounced on 19/02/2016. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325625 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the need to apportion credit for services used in 'output service' and 'trading' activities. The decision highlighted the non-retrospective nature of the amendment deeming 'trading' as an 'exempted service,' affirming the validity of the order-in-appeal. The appeal was consequently rejected, and the judgment was pronounced on 19/02/2016. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325625