<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 804 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants, manufacturers of excisable goods, to avail Cenvat credit and reverse proportionate credit for exempted goods under Rule 6(3)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original and remanded the matter to calculate the reversal amount and interest payable. It emphasized that the revenue cannot impose a specific option under Rule 6(3) on the appellant and that the appellant&#039;s willingness to pay interest on reversed amounts is significant in decision-making.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 804 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants, manufacturers of excisable goods, to avail Cenvat credit and reverse proportionate credit for exempted goods under Rule 6(3)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original and remanded the matter to calculate the reversal amount and interest payable. It emphasized that the revenue cannot impose a specific option under Rule 6(3) on the appellant and that the appellant&#039;s willingness to pay interest on reversed amounts is significant in decision-making.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>