https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325618 The tribunal dismissed the appeal and affirmed the sustainment of the impugned order confirming the central excise duty demand, interest, and penalty against the appellant. The decision was based on substantial evidence including voluntary confessions by the partners and supporting statements from suppliers and buyers, indicating duty evasion through clandestine clearances. The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument regarding cum duty price treatment, emphasizing the lack of proper invoices and the partners' failure to claim that the price included duty. The impugned order was upheld without any flaws warranting appellate intervention. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:33:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325618 The tribunal dismissed the appeal and affirmed the sustainment of the impugned order confirming the central excise duty demand, interest, and penalty against the appellant. The decision was based on substantial evidence including voluntary confessions by the partners and supporting statements from suppliers and buyers, indicating duty evasion through clandestine clearances. The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument regarding cum duty price treatment, emphasizing the lack of proper invoices and the partners' failure to claim that the price included duty. The impugned order was upheld without any flaws warranting appellate intervention. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325618