<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 796 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325612</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the customs authorities&#039; decision, ruling that the Petitioners, having benefited from Rule 19(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, are not entitled to duty drawback under Notification No. 26/2003-Cus (NT) dated 01.04.2003. The Court emphasized strict interpretation of fiscal laws and the specific exclusions in the Notification, leading to the rejection of the Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 796 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325612</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the customs authorities&#039; decision, ruling that the Petitioners, having benefited from Rule 19(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, are not entitled to duty drawback under Notification No. 26/2003-Cus (NT) dated 01.04.2003. The Court emphasized strict interpretation of fiscal laws and the specific exclusions in the Notification, leading to the rejection of the Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>