<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325611</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking provisional release of seized gold under the Customs Act. It directed the respondents to commence and complete the adjudication process within twelve weeks. The court emphasized adherence to legal procedures, highlighted the necessity for timely adjudication, and allowed the petitioner to file an application under section 110A of the Customs Act for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325611</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking provisional release of seized gold under the Customs Act. It directed the respondents to commence and complete the adjudication process within twelve weeks. The court emphasized adherence to legal procedures, highlighted the necessity for timely adjudication, and allowed the petitioner to file an application under section 110A of the Customs Act for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>