https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325608 The court interpreted a pricing clause in a tender notice for supplying drugs to the CGHS. The dispute centered on whether the entire VAT should be reduced from the MRP before applying the discount. The court held in favor of the petitioner, quashing the recoveries by CGHS and ordering refunds. The court emphasized the supplier's liability for taxes and rationalized the payment formula. It compared the disputed clause with a newer, simplified clause introduced by CGHS for subsequent contracts. The judgment favored the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with the court's interpretation regarding VAT payments. en-us Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325608 The court interpreted a pricing clause in a tender notice for supplying drugs to the CGHS. The dispute centered on whether the entire VAT should be reduced from the MRP before applying the discount. The court held in favor of the petitioner, quashing the recoveries by CGHS and ordering refunds. The court emphasized the supplier's liability for taxes and rationalized the payment formula. It compared the disputed clause with a newer, simplified clause introduced by CGHS for subsequent contracts. The judgment favored the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with the court's interpretation regarding VAT payments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325608