<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1045 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection. The deletion of the addition of Rs. 3,46,61,718/- on account of alleged receipt of on money and excess sale of plots was justified due to lack of corroborative evidence. Additionally, the restriction of disallowance to Rs. 6,51,470/- out of a total addition of Rs. 14,65,772/- was upheld, considering the documented work in progress.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:42:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1045 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection. The deletion of the addition of Rs. 3,46,61,718/- on account of alleged receipt of on money and excess sale of plots was justified due to lack of corroborative evidence. Additionally, the restriction of disallowance to Rs. 6,51,470/- out of a total addition of Rs. 14,65,772/- was upheld, considering the documented work in progress.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>