<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (4) TMI 81 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180421</link>
    <description>A statutory appointment as agent under section 43 is confined to the assessment year for which it is made, because income-tax assessment is year-specific and the agency does not automatically continue into a later year. The phrase &quot;for all purposes&quot; applies only to the incidents of that particular assessment, including levy and recovery for that year, and does not extend the agency to impose advance-tax liability for a subsequent assessment year. Advance tax under section 18A relates to the later year&#039;s tax liability, so a fresh and valid appointment was required for that year. In its absence, the demand notices were without jurisdiction and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:02:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (4) TMI 81 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180421</link>
      <description>A statutory appointment as agent under section 43 is confined to the assessment year for which it is made, because income-tax assessment is year-specific and the agency does not automatically continue into a later year. The phrase &quot;for all purposes&quot; applies only to the incidents of that particular assessment, including levy and recovery for that year, and does not extend the agency to impose advance-tax liability for a subsequent assessment year. Advance tax under section 18A relates to the later year&#039;s tax liability, so a fresh and valid appointment was required for that year. In its absence, the demand notices were without jurisdiction and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>