<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 745 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180420</link>
    <description>The commentary examines whether amendments to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including lapsing provisions, apply to acquisitions under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, and how Section 127 of the planning statute should be construed. It also addresses whether conduct required under Section 127 is confined to steps under the planning law or requires commencement of acquisition proceedings under the land acquisition law. The analysis highlights the constitutional implications of treating a State enactment as incorporating later amendments to a Central statute, and notes that these issues were considered of general importance requiring determination by a Constitution Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 745 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180420</link>
      <description>The commentary examines whether amendments to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including lapsing provisions, apply to acquisitions under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, and how Section 127 of the planning statute should be construed. It also addresses whether conduct required under Section 127 is confined to steps under the planning law or requires commencement of acquisition proceedings under the land acquisition law. The analysis highlights the constitutional implications of treating a State enactment as incorporating later amendments to a Central statute, and notes that these issues were considered of general importance requiring determination by a Constitution Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>