<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 160 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, confirming a reduced duty demand while setting aside other components of the demand. The judgment clarified the entitlement to exemption under notification No. 9/2000 and the correct application of duty rates on consignments cleared under CT-3 certificate, providing a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and factual circumstances involved in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 160 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, confirming a reduced duty demand while setting aside other components of the demand. The judgment clarified the entitlement to exemption under notification No. 9/2000 and the correct application of duty rates on consignments cleared under CT-3 certificate, providing a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and factual circumstances involved in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>