https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180411 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta and the award passed by the Arbitration Tribunal. The court found that the appellants were liable for breach of contract, the contract was not void under Section 56, the arbitrators had jurisdiction, there was no legal misconduct, and the basis for awarding damages was appropriate. The appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 19 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:55:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180411 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta and the award passed by the Arbitration Tribunal. The court found that the appellants were liable for breach of contract, the contract was not void under Section 56, the arbitrators had jurisdiction, there was no legal misconduct, and the basis for awarding damages was appropriate. The appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180411