<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 691 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180410</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the matter to go back to the Assessing Officer for tax assessment on capital gains. The Court found that the assessees should be taxed only for capital gains, similar to other family members in comparable situations, rather than as undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 691 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180410</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the matter to go back to the Assessing Officer for tax assessment on capital gains. The Court found that the assessees should be taxed only for capital gains, similar to other family members in comparable situations, rather than as undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>