<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 679 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180406</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeals, overturning the judgments of the Calcutta and Delhi HCs. It held that company paid staff are distinct from regular employees and cannot claim absorption under Rule 308 or equal pay. The 1999 Scheme for absorption was upheld, but the SC directed the Government to create a similar scheme for Group D posts to address discrimination. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was rejected due to the temporary nature of employment. The SC emphasized judicial discipline and adherence to established principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 679 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180406</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeals, overturning the judgments of the Calcutta and Delhi HCs. It held that company paid staff are distinct from regular employees and cannot claim absorption under Rule 308 or equal pay. The 1999 Scheme for absorption was upheld, but the SC directed the Government to create a similar scheme for Group D posts to address discrimination. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was rejected due to the temporary nature of employment. The SC emphasized judicial discipline and adherence to established principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>