<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 779 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325595</link>
    <description>Remission of Central Excise duty on destroyed goods was available only on strict compliance with Rule 21, including a proper application, supporting proof of unfitness for consumption or marketing, and destruction only after prior permission and supervision. Where the assessee destroyed the goods on its own before permission was granted and without following the prescribed procedure, remission was rejected. Once remission failed, the consequential demand of duty, interest and penalty on the destroyed goods was sustained, and the challenge to that demand also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:40:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 779 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325595</link>
      <description>Remission of Central Excise duty on destroyed goods was available only on strict compliance with Rule 21, including a proper application, supporting proof of unfitness for consumption or marketing, and destruction only after prior permission and supervision. Where the assessee destroyed the goods on its own before permission was granted and without following the prescribed procedure, remission was rejected. Once remission failed, the consequential demand of duty, interest and penalty on the destroyed goods was sustained, and the challenge to that demand also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>