<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 765 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325581</link>
    <description>The court directed the Registry to refer the case to a larger bench for further consideration regarding the interplay between Section 15A and Section 15J of the SEBI Act in the context of penalty imposition for insider trading violations. The court emphasized the necessity for a comprehensive review to ensure consistency and fairness in adjudging penalties, highlighting concerns over potential disproportionate penalties and the need for harmonious statutory construction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 765 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325581</link>
      <description>The court directed the Registry to refer the case to a larger bench for further consideration regarding the interplay between Section 15A and Section 15J of the SEBI Act in the context of penalty imposition for insider trading violations. The court emphasized the necessity for a comprehensive review to ensure consistency and fairness in adjudging penalties, highlighting concerns over potential disproportionate penalties and the need for harmonious statutory construction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>