<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 740 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325556</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 10B requires approval of a 100% export-oriented undertaking by the prescribed statutory authority, and STPI approval alone is not equivalent to that approval; the claim under section 10B therefore fails. An alternate claim under section 10A, having been raised before the Assessing Officer and appellate authority, may be examined on its statutory merits where factual verification of compliance and supporting documents is required; that claim was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 740 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325556</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 10B requires approval of a 100% export-oriented undertaking by the prescribed statutory authority, and STPI approval alone is not equivalent to that approval; the claim under section 10B therefore fails. An alternate claim under section 10A, having been raised before the Assessing Officer and appellate authority, may be examined on its statutory merits where factual verification of compliance and supporting documents is required; that claim was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>