https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180388 The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes as the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the DIT(E) for reconsideration in light of the arguments and legal decisions presented by the appellant. The appellant's contention that commencement of activities is not a mandatory condition for registration u/s. 12A, supported by legal precedents, led to the decision directing a reconsideration in accordance with the law. en-us Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180388 The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes as the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the DIT(E) for reconsideration in light of the arguments and legal decisions presented by the appellant. The appellant's contention that commencement of activities is not a mandatory condition for registration u/s. 12A, supported by legal precedents, led to the decision directing a reconsideration in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180388