<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 880 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180384</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2001-2002, 2002-2003, and 2003-2004, challenging unexplained cash credits in bank accounts, were dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found the credits adequately explained, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders due to inconsistencies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach. The assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was also dismissed as the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the same year was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 880 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180384</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2001-2002, 2002-2003, and 2003-2004, challenging unexplained cash credits in bank accounts, were dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found the credits adequately explained, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders due to inconsistencies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach. The assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was also dismissed as the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the same year was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>