<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1164 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s decision on the determination of annual rateable value for property tax, deeming it beyond the initial remand order&#039;s scope. Regarding the computation of income from house property under different sections of the Act, due to the Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider relevant judgments, the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration in light of specific judgments, with the calculation of annual rateable value to be based on municipal authorities&#039; assessment. Additionally, a separate judgment set aside an impugned order in other related appeals, remanding the matter for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1164 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s decision on the determination of annual rateable value for property tax, deeming it beyond the initial remand order&#039;s scope. Regarding the computation of income from house property under different sections of the Act, due to the Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider relevant judgments, the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration in light of specific judgments, with the calculation of annual rateable value to be based on municipal authorities&#039; assessment. Additionally, a separate judgment set aside an impugned order in other related appeals, remanding the matter for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>