<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 229 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180376</link>
    <description>A statutory housing board is not a &quot;local authority&quot; for Section 32(iv) of the Payment of Bonus Act unless it substantially has municipal-type attributes, including elected representation, meaningful autonomy, and control over a local fund. The Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971 created a body corporate under pervasive State control, without elected representation or a true local fund, so its betterment-charge powers were insufficient to confer local authority status. A deeming fiction limited to that Act and the Land Acquisition Act could not be extended to the Bonus Act, and Article 12 did not alter the meaning of &quot;local authority&quot;. The exemption from bonus liability was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 229 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180376</link>
      <description>A statutory housing board is not a &quot;local authority&quot; for Section 32(iv) of the Payment of Bonus Act unless it substantially has municipal-type attributes, including elected representation, meaningful autonomy, and control over a local fund. The Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971 created a body corporate under pervasive State control, without elected representation or a true local fund, so its betterment-charge powers were insufficient to confer local authority status. A deeming fiction limited to that Act and the Land Acquisition Act could not be extended to the Bonus Act, and Article 12 did not alter the meaning of &quot;local authority&quot;. The exemption from bonus liability was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>