https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180372 The High Court quashed the CIT's order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the CIT to consider relevant judicial precedents and past practices. The Court emphasized that employers are not obligated to verify the actual use of allowances by employees. The Board's claim for a refund was deferred pending the new adjudication. The writ petition was allowed to the extent indicated, with no order as to costs. en-us Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180372 The High Court quashed the CIT's order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the CIT to consider relevant judicial precedents and past practices. The Court emphasized that employers are not obligated to verify the actual use of allowances by employees. The Board's claim for a refund was deferred pending the new adjudication. The writ petition was allowed to the extent indicated, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180372