<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 822 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180363</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed all three appeals by the revenue regarding the deletion of premium on transfer fees and TDR premium for assessment years 2003-04, 04-05, and 05-06. The Court held that the transfer fees and TDR premium were not chargeable to tax based on the principle of mutuality, as there was no commercial element involved. Previous decisions by the Tribunal and High Court supported the application of mutuality to such fees, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:22:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 822 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180363</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed all three appeals by the revenue regarding the deletion of premium on transfer fees and TDR premium for assessment years 2003-04, 04-05, and 05-06. The Court held that the transfer fees and TDR premium were not chargeable to tax based on the principle of mutuality, as there was no commercial element involved. Previous decisions by the Tribunal and High Court supported the application of mutuality to such fees, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>