<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Deems Additional Charges under IPC Sections 409, 420 as Abuse of Process After Conviction Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28071</link>
    <description>Bouncing of cheques - appellant having already been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - it is a clear case of abuse of the process of the court by dragging the appellant to prosecute him for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 of the Code - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:40:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Deems Additional Charges under IPC Sections 409, 420 as Abuse of Process After Conviction Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28071</link>
      <description>Bouncing of cheques - appellant having already been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - it is a clear case of abuse of the process of the court by dragging the appellant to prosecute him for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 of the Code - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:40:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>