<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 734 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of reassessment proceedings was invalid as the assessing officer did not allege any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment and the reassessment was based on a mere change of opinion without any new material. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that no substantial legal questions arose, and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:55:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 734 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of reassessment proceedings was invalid as the assessing officer did not allege any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment and the reassessment was based on a mere change of opinion without any new material. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that no substantial legal questions arose, and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>