https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325543 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee on grounds 2, 3, and 4, reversing the CIT (A)'s order. It was noted that if the Supreme Court decides the issue of roaming charges against the assessee in the Vodafone case, the AO or any other authorized officer may move an appropriate application. The appeals were allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 5/02/2016. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:54:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325543 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee on grounds 2, 3, and 4, reversing the CIT (A)'s order. It was noted that if the Supreme Court decides the issue of roaming charges against the assessee in the Vodafone case, the AO or any other authorized officer may move an appropriate application. The appeals were allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 5/02/2016. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325543