<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 725 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(10) as the project constituted development of housing projects, not a works contract. The completion certificate was deemed not mandatory, and multiple approvals did not disqualify the deduction claim. The Tribunal emphasized the method of execution should not be decisive. The appeals were decided in favor of the assessees, allowing the deduction under Section 80IB(10).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 725 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(10) as the project constituted development of housing projects, not a works contract. The completion certificate was deemed not mandatory, and multiple approvals did not disqualify the deduction claim. The Tribunal emphasized the method of execution should not be decisive. The appeals were decided in favor of the assessees, allowing the deduction under Section 80IB(10).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>