<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 719 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325535</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that passing an order in the name of a non-existent entity constitutes a jurisdictional defect, rendering the order invalid. The Tribunal emphasized that such a defect cannot be cured by procedural provisions and must be considered void ab initio. The decision was made in line with legal precedents and the specific provisions of the Income Tax Act, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 719 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325535</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that passing an order in the name of a non-existent entity constitutes a jurisdictional defect, rendering the order invalid. The Tribunal emphasized that such a defect cannot be cured by procedural provisions and must be considered void ab initio. The decision was made in line with legal precedents and the specific provisions of the Income Tax Act, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>